This is the start of my third year in the district, and I have not been asked my input as to technology integration, whether it be hardware of software. If my district did utilize these forms, I figure that last year would have been an awesome opportunity to do so. We just went through a massive technology upgrade with each teacher receiving a new workstation. Each workstation has office 2010 loaded on it. With all the new open source software available, was there even a discussion as to utilizing any of the free programs? My guess is probably not. If there was, it was probably on an administrative level.
In my other class this semester, we talked about having a need for the technology before purchasing it. Don’t put the cart before the horse theory. Pretty much every teacher has a smart board in our district, but was there a need for every teacher, was there a want from every teacher? I am sure that there were many teachers that would have been fine without a smart board. Are they now going to sit unused, because a needs assessment wasn’t done? I understand that the smart board is hardware, but the same process could be used for hardware as well.
I think software selection forms would benefit teachers, because decisions can be made on who wants the technology, who will use the technology, and then award the technology to those teachers. Selection forms can also help because if there is a mass desire for a piece of software, licenses can be purchased in bulk, often reducing the cost per license. If there is a small demand for a particular software title, possible solutions could be looked into including freeware, and IU support.
Using software selection forms also helps guide technology purchasing back to the teachers who have fresh ideas, and more recent schooling, instead of administrators and coordinators who may have very little recent background in technology and software applications.